USGS-NWQL: O-2060-01: Pesticides in Water by SPE and HPLC-MS
- Summary
- Analytes
- Revision
- Data and Sites
|
Official Method Name
|
Methods of Analysis by the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Quality Laboratory - Determination of Pesticides in Water by Graphitized Carbon-Based Solid-Phase Extraction and HPLC-MS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Current Revision
| 2001 | ||||
|
Media
|
WATER | ||||
|
Instrumentation
|
High Performance Liquid Chromatography | ||||
|
Method Subcategory
|
Organic | ||||
|
Method Source
|
USGS-NWQL
|
||||
|
Citation
|
Furlong, E.T., Anderson, B.D., Werner, S.L., Soliven, P.P., Coffey, L.J., and Burkhardt, M.R., 2001, Methods of analysis by the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Quality Laboratory--Determination of pesticides in water by graphitized carbon-based solid-phase extraction and high-performance liquid chromatography/mass spectometry: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4134 | ||||
|
Brief Method Summary
|
A prefiltered water sample of 1 L is pumped through the SPE cartridge at a flow rate of 20 mL/min. After extraction, the adsorbed compounds are eluted from the SPE cartridge using two sequential elutions of 1.5 mL methanol, followed by 13 mL of an 80-percent methylene chloride and 20-percent methanol mixture that has been acidified with trifluoroacetic acid anhydride (0.2 percent). The two fractions are reduced under nitrogen to near dryness and then combined. The final volume for the extract is 1,000 uL. Analytes are chromatographically separated by HPLC using a reverse-phase octadecylsilane HPLC column, which is coupled to an electrospray ionization interface and quadrupole mass spectrometer for detection, identification, and quantitation. Each extract is analyzed twice using separate ionization modes. The first analysis is for those compounds that preferentially form positive ions under electrospray conditions, and the second is for those compounds that preferentially form negative ions. The terms "extraction" and "elution" are used to define specific actions during sample processing. Extraction is the transfer of the selected compounds from the sample onto the SPE cartridge. Elution is the removal of the selected compounds from the SPE cartridge. | ||||
|
Scope and Application
|
The method is applicable for determining pesticides and pesticide metabolites that are efficiently isolated from the sample matrix and adsorbed onto a graphitized carbon black sorbent-filled cartridge, and chromatographically resolved and identified using an HPLC coupled by an electrospray ionization source to a quadrupole mass spectrometer. The method has been tested and validated for filtered surface water and ground water. Although not specifically tested for other aqueous matrices, it could be applied to precipitation, wastewater, tile drain discharge, and other sample types as long as the samples have been filtered using the method of Shelton (1994), and the user recognizes that performance characteristics of new matrices are not tested and any results would be provisional. Two classes of determinations are reported for samples analyzed by this method. Compounds for which the results of the determination are reported without qualification make up the first class. Compounds for which the results of the determination are reported as qualified estimates, and the concentration qualified with an "E", are in the second class. | ||||
|
Applicable Concentration Range
|
0.025 - 1.0 (undiluted) | ||||
|
Interferences
|
Interferences might be caused by compounds recovered from a sample matrix that contains one or more of the same ions as the selected compound and that cannot be chromatographically resolved from the selected compounds. Compared to optical detection methods typically used with HPLC, mass spectrometry is less affected by interferences, but the potential for interferences remains and requires special attention to the ratios of the characteristic ions of interest to avoid false positive detections. In addition, for the sulfonylurea and imidazolinone compound classes, sample matrix components have been shown empirically to result in an apparent increase in compound concentration (Furlong and others, 2000). | ||||
|
Quality Control Requirements
|
Laboratory extraction samples are formed into sets, each consisting of 10 environmental samples, a set reagent spike and set reagent blank, for a total of 12 samples. Field equipment blanks and laboratory matrix spikes, whose frequency is determined by the method user, provide additional quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC). The frequency of analysis of these QA/QC samples and the aspects of the analytical process they monitor are described in the source document. | ||||
|
Sample Handling
|
GCC - This schedule consumes the entire sample. Description: 1 L Glass bottle, amber bottle baked at 450 deg C by laboratory. Filter sample with a burned glass fiber filter. Treatment and Preservation: DO NOT RINSE BOTTLE. Do not fill bottle beyond shoulder, reagents must be added to the sample at the NWQL before analyses. Chill sample and maintain at 4 deg C, ship immediately. | ||||
|
Maximum Holding Time
|
7 days from sampling | ||||
|
Relative Cost
|
$201 to $400 | ||||
|
Sample Preparation Methods
|
USGS-WRIR 95-4105 |
This method has 66 analytes associated with it.
| Analyte | Detection Level |
Bias | Precision | Pct False Positive |
Pct False Negative |
Spiking Level |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2,4-D(94-75-7)
|
0.011 ug/L | 102% Rec (SL) | 14.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.03 ug/L | ||
|
2,4-D methyl ester(1928-38-7)
|
0.004 ug/L | 84% Rec (SL) | 5.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.03 ug/L | ||
|
2-Hydroxyatrazine(2163-68-0)
|
0.004 ug/L | 103% Rec (SL) | 5.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.03 ug/L | ||
|
3(4-chlorophenyl)-1-methyl urea(5352-88-5)
|
0.012 ug/L | 96% Rec (SL) | 14.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.03 ug/L | ||
|
3-Hydroxycarbofuran(16655-82-6)
|
0.003 ug/L | 92% Rec (SL) | 4.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.25 ug/L | ||
|
3-Ketocarbofuran(16709-30-1)
|
0.003 ug/L | 92% Rec (SL) | 4.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.03 ug/L | ||
|
Acifluorfen(50594-66-6)
|
0.003 ug/L | 84% Rec (SL) | 4.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.03 ug/L | ||
|
Aldicarb(116-06-3)
|
0.020 ug/L | 11% Rec (SL) | 27.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.25 ug/L | ||
|
Aldicarb sulfone(1646-88-4)
|
0.010 ug/L | 55% Rec (SL) | 14.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.25 ug/L | ||
|
Aldicarb sulfoxide(1646-87-3)
|
0.004 ug/L | 31% Rec (SL) | 6.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.25 ug/L | ||
|
Atrazine(1912-24-9)
|
0.005 ug/L | 74% Rec (SL) | 6.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.25 ug/L | ||
|
Bendiocarb(22781-23-3)
|
0.013 ug/L | 76% Rec (SL) | 17.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.03 ug/L | ||
|
Benomyl(17804-35-2)
|
0.002 ug/L | 89% Rec (SL) | 2.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.25 ug/L | ||
|
Bensulfuron-methyl(83055-99-6)
|
0.008 ug/L | 97% Rec (SL) | 8.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.03 ug/L | ||
|
Bentazon(25057-89-0)
|
0.006 ug/L | 39% Rec (SL) | 11.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.25 ug/L | ||
|
Bromacil(314-40-9)
|
0.016 ug/L | 68% Rec (SL) | 19.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.25 ug/L | ||
|
Bromoxynil(1689-84-5)
|
0.009 ug/L | 60% Rec (SL) | 17.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.25 ug/L | ||
|
Caffeine(58-08-2)
|
0.005 ug/L | 101% Rec (SL) | 6.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.25 ug/L | ||
|
Carbamate pesticides(E-12895)
|
N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
|
Carbaryl(63-25-2)
|
0.014 ug/L | 88% Rec (SL) | 16.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.25 ug/L | ||
|
Carbofuran(1563-66-2)
|
0.003 ug/L | 91% Rec (SL) | 4.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.25 ug/L | ||
|
Chloramben methyl ester(7286-84-2)
|
0.009 ug/L | 56% Rec (SL) | 22.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.03 ug/L | ||
|
Chlorimuron-ethyl(90982-32-4)
|
0.005 ug/L | 103% Rec (SL) | 5.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.03 ug/L | ||
|
Chlorothalonil(1897-45-6)
|
0.017 ug/L | 20% Rec (SL) | 36.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.25 ug/L | ||
|
Clopyralid(1702-17-6)
|
0.007 ug/L | 79% Rec (SL) | 8.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.03 ug/L | ||
|
Cycloate(1134-23-2)
|
0.007 ug/L | 38% Rec (SL) | 9.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.25 ug/L | ||
|
DCPA mono-acid degradate(887-54-7)
|
0.006 ug/L | 82% Rec (SL) | 7.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.25 ug/L | ||
|
Desethylatrazine(6190-65-4)
|
0.014 ug/L | 69% Rec (SL) | 15.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.03 ug/L | ||
|
Desethyldeisopropylatrazine(3397-62-4)
|
0.022 ug/L | 65% Rec (SL) | 16.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.03 ug/L | ||
|
Desisopropylatrazine(1007-28-9)
|
0.005 ug/L | 67% Rec (SL) | 7.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.03 ug/L | ||
|
Dicamba(1918-00-9)
|
0.006 ug/L | 89% Rec (SL) | 8.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.25 ug/L | ||
|
Dichlorprop(120-36-5)
|
0.007 ug/L | 76% Rec (SL) | 8.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.25 ug/L | ||
|
Dinoseb(88-85-7)
|
0.006 ug/L | 80% Rec (SL) | 29.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.25 ug/L | ||
|
Diphenamid(957-51-7)
|
0.013 ug/L | 83% Rec (SL) | 19.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.25 ug/L | ||
|
Diuron(330-54-1)
|
0.008 ug/L | 90% Rec (SL) | 9.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.25 ug/L | ||
|
Fenuron(101-42-8)
|
0.016 ug/L | 74% Rec (SL) | 18.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.03 ug/L | ||
|
Flumetsulam(98967-40-9)
|
0.006 ug/L | 130% Rec (SL) | 7.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.03 ug/L | ||
|
Fluometuron(2164-17-2)
|
0.016 ug/L | 86% Rec (SL) | 17.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.25 ug/L | ||
|
Herbicides(E-12839)
|
N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
|
Imazaquin(81335-37-7)
|
0.008 ug/L | 123% Rec (SL) | 10.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.03 ug/L | ||
|
Imazethapyr(81335-77-5)
|
0.008 ug/L | 114% Rec (SL) | 11.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.03 ug/L | ||
|
Imidacloprid(138261-41-3)
|
0.003 ug/L | 106% Rec (SL) | 4.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.25 ug/L | ||
|
Linuron(330-55-2)
|
0.007 ug/L | 90% Rec (SL) | 8.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.25 ug/L | ||
|
MCPA(94-74-6)
|
0.008 ug/L | 71% Rec (SL) | 11.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.25 ug/L | ||
|
MCPB(94-81-5)
|
0.008 ug/L | 56% Rec (SL) | 12.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.03 ug/L | ||
|
Metalaxyl(57837-19-1)
|
0.010 ug/L | 86% Rec (SL) | 13.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.25 ug/L | ||
|
Methiocarb(2032-65-7)
|
0.004 ug/L | 42% Rec (SL) | 5.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.25 ug/L | ||
|
Methomyl(16752-77-5)
|
0.002 ug/L | 43% Rec (SL) | 3.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.25 ug/L | ||
|
Methomyl oxime(13749-94-5)
|
0.005 ug/L | 3% Rec (SL) | 19.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.03 ug/L | ||
|
Metsulfuron-methyl(74223-64-6)
|
0.012 ug/L | 25% Rec (SL) | 16.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.03 ug/L | ||
|
Neburon(555-37-3)
|
0.006 ug/L | 90% Rec (SL) | 8.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.03 ug/L | ||
|
Nicosulfuron(111991-09-4)
|
0.007 ug/L | 104% Rec (SL) | 8.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.03 ug/L | ||
|
Norflurazon(27314-13-2)
|
0.008 ug/L | 70% Rec (SL) | 10.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.25 ug/L | ||
|
Oryzalin(19044-88-3)
|
0.009 ug/L | 81% Rec (SL) | 9.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.03 ug/L | ||
|
Oxamyl(23135-22-0)
|
0.006 ug/L | 64% Rec (SL) | 9.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.25 ug/L | ||
|
Oxamyl oxime(30558-43-1)
|
0.007 ug/L | 10% Rec (SL) | 30.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.03 ug/L | ||
|
Picloram(1918-02-1)
|
0.010 ug/L | 89% Rec (SL) | 13.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.25 ug/L | ||
|
Propham(122-42-9)
|
0.005 ug/L | 91% Rec (SL) | 6.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.03 ug/L | ||
|
Propiconazole(60207-90-1)
|
0.011 ug/L | 102% Rec (SL) | 10.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.03 ug/L | ||
|
Propoxur(114-26-1)
|
0.004 ug/L | 84% Rec (SL) | 6.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.25 ug/L | ||
|
Siduron(1982-49-6)
|
0.008 ug/L | 80% Rec (SL) | 9.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.25 ug/L | ||
|
Sulfometuron-methyl(74222-97-2)
|
0.004 ug/L | 86% Rec (SL) | 6.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.03 ug/L | ||
|
Tebuthiuron(34014-18-1)
|
0.003 ug/L | 100% Rec (SL) | 4.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.25 ug/L | ||
|
Terbacil(5902-51-2)
|
0.005 ug/L | 66% Rec (SL) | 7.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.25 ug/L | ||
|
Tribenuron-methyl(101200-48-0)
|
0.004 ug/L | 6% Rec (SL) | 18.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.03 ug/L | ||
|
Trichlopyr(55335-06-3)
|
0.011 ug/L | 83% Rec (SL) | 14.00 % RSD (SL) | 0.03 ug/L |
| Precision Descriptor Notes: | Single-operator method detection limits in organic-free water samples fortified with pesticides at a concentration of 0.025 ug/L ranged from 0.0019 to 0.022 ug/L for all compounds in the method. The grand mean (mean of mean recoveries for individual compounds) recoveries in organic-free water samples ranged from 72 to 89 percent, fortified with pesticides at three concentrations between 0.025 and 0.5 ug/L. Grand mean recoveries in ground- and surface-water samples ranged from 46 to 119 percent, also fortified with pesticides at three concentrations between 0.025 and 0.5 ug/L. Long-term recoveries from reagent water spikes were used to demonstrate that 38 of 65 compounds can be reported without qualification of the quantitative result across the analytical range of the method. The remaining 27 are reported with qualified estimates of concentration because of greater variability of recovery. Bias and variation data for 17 of the analytes in this method were qualified with an E-code because the data was outside of acceptable ranges; for example, the mean recovery was less than 60 percent or greater than 120 percent, or the f-pseudosigma was greater than 25 percent. Refer to the method report for more information. |
|---|---|
| Detection Level Note: | Method detection limits (MDLs) were determined for this method using the procedures of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1997). |
| Revision | PDF/Link |
|---|---|
| 2001 |
The Water Quality Portal contains
sample results from
sites that use this method.
Download WQP data
Select data:
File format:
Sites where this method was used
Loading Sites ...



