USGS-NWQL: O-1433-01: Wastewater compounds in water by SPE and GC/MS
- Summary
- Analytes
- Revision
- Data and Sites
Official Method Name
|
Determination of Wastewater Compounds by Polystyrene-Divinylbenzene Solid-Phase Extraction and Capillary-Column Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Current Revision
| 2001 | ||||
Media
|
WATER | ||||
Instrumentation
|
Gas Chromatography with Mass Spectrometry Detection | ||||
Method Subcategory
|
Organic | ||||
Method Source
|
USGS-NWQL
|
||||
Citation
|
Zaugg, S.D., Smith, S.G., Schroeder, M.P., Barber, L.B., and Burkhardt, M.R., 2002, Methods of analysis by the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Quality Laboratory--Determination of wastewater compounds by polystyrene-divinylbenzene solid-phase extraction and capillary-column gas chromatography/mass spectrometry: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 01-4186. | ||||
Brief Method Summary
|
Water samples are filtered in the field by using glass-fiber filters (0.7-um nominal pore diameter) to remove suspended particulate matter (Sandstrom, 1995) before they are sent to the NWQL. Filtered 1-L water samples are extracted with disposable, polypropylene SPE cartridges that contain polystyrene-divinylbenzene phase. The SPE cartridges are dried thoroughly by using a flow rate of 2 L/min of pressurized nitrogen, which takes about 45 minutes. After the SPE cartridges have dried, the sample bottles are rinsed thoroughly with a mixture of 15 mL dichloromethane (DCM) and diethyl ether (EE), at 4:1. The DCM-EE rinsate also is used to elute sorbed compounds from the corresponding SPE cartridges. Next, the extract is evaporated by using a gentle stream of nitrogen to a final volume of 0.4 mL and then is transferred to an autosampler vial that contains a 400-mL glass insert. Finally, the concentrated extracts are deter-mined by capillary-column gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS). | ||||
Scope and Application
|
This manual method is suitable for the determination of microgram-per-liter concentrations of compounds in filtered wastewater and natural-water samples. The method is applicable to compounds that are efficiently partitioned from the water phase onto the polystyrene-divinylbenzene (PSDVB) organic phase, and are sufficiently volatile and thermally stable for gas chromatography. Samples are filtered to remove suspended particulate matter, so this method is suitable only for dissolved-phase compounds. | ||||
Applicable Concentration Range
|
0.50 - 4.0 (undiluted) | ||||
Interferences
|
Organic compounds that have gas-chromatographic retention times and characteristic ions with a mass identical to those of the compounds of interest might interfere, and because of the complex nature of wastewater, there are often unknown compounds that interfere. Phthalates and preservatives (BHT and related compounds) in the cartridge material often contribute to low-concentration contamination. Samples, collection equipment, or SPE cartridges that are handled improperly also might become contaminated with soaps, caffeine, and fragrances. | ||||
Quality Control Requirements
|
First, the sample matrix must be consistent with the requirements of the method (filtered water). Problematic sample matrices will affect the performance of the method during sample preparation and analysis. Extremely dirty sample matrices, such as raw sewage, are discouraged because they contaminate sample preparation equipment and instrumentation, thus affecting the results of subsequent samples. Sample extract(s) are analyzed in an instrument batch or sequence to provide additional information for quality assurance and facilitate corrective actions that might be required if performance criteria are not met. The analytical sequence includes a set spike and blank sample, as well as bracketing continuing calibration verification solutions (CCVs) to check periodically at designated intervals (10 environmental samples or less) that the instrument is in compliance with initial calibration criteria. A low-concentration standard equivalent to 1 ug/L (or less) is analyzed in each sequence after the environmental samples to ensure that instrument sensitivity is maintained throughout the sample set. If available, field matrix spike samples at concentrations between 2 and 5 times the expected MDL also can be analyzed to ensure method sensitivity for different sample matrices. | ||||
Sample Handling
|
1L GCC - This schedule consumes the entire sample. Description: 1 L Glass bottle, amber bottle baked at 450 deg C by laboratory - SOME GCCs should be filtered. br> CHECK METHOD REFERENCE OR EMAIL LABHELP@USGS.GOV FOR FILTERING REQUIREMENTS. br> Treatment and Preservation: DO NOT RINSE BOTTLE. Do not fill bottle beyond shoulder, reagents must be added to the sample at the NWQL before analyses. Chill sample and maintain at 4 deg C, ship immediately. | ||||
Maximum Holding Time
|
14 days from sampling | ||||
Relative Cost
|
$201 to $400 | ||||
Sample Preparation Methods
|
USGS-WRIR 95-4105 |
This method has 69 analytes associated with it.
Analyte | Detection Level |
Bias | Precision | Pct False Positive |
Pct False Negative |
Spiking Level |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,4-Dichlorobenzene(106-46-7)
|
0.280 ug/L | 30% Rec (SL) | 13.77 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
1-Methylnaphthalene(90-12-0)
|
0.130 ug/L | 58% Rec (SL) | 14.98 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
17beta-Estradiol(50-28-2)
|
1.640 ug/L | 75% Rec (SL) | 3.93 % RSD (SL) | 16.00 ug/L | ||
2,6-Dimethylnaphthalene(581-42-0)
|
0.100 ug/L | 54% Rec (SL) | 11.85 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
2-Methylnaphthalene(91-57-6)
|
0.130 ug/L | 55% Rec (SL) | 15.12 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
3-Methyl-1H-indole(83-34-1)
|
0.300 ug/L | 50% Rec (SL) | 39.49 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
3beta-Coprostanol(360-68-9)
|
0.520 ug/L | 82% Rec (SL) | 10.58 % RSD (SL) | 2.00 ug/L | ||
4-Cumylphenol(599-64-4)
|
0.370 ug/L | 59% Rec (SL) | 41.38 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
4-n-Octylphenol(1806-26-4)
|
0.330 ug/L | 38% Rec (SL) | 57.43 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
4-tert-Octylphenol(140-66-9)
|
0.370 ug/L | 43% Rec (SL) | 56.19 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
5-Methyl-1H-benzotriazole(136-85-6)
|
0.920 ug/L | 99% Rec (SL) | 2.40 % RSD (SL) | 16.00 ug/L | ||
AHTN(21145-77-7)
|
0.080 ug/L | 78% Rec (SL) | 6.90 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Acetophenone(98-86-2)
|
0.090 ug/L | 73% Rec (SL) | 6.14 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Anthracene(120-12-7)
|
0.110 ug/L | 73% Rec (SL) | 9.67 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Anthraquinone (8CI)(84-65-1)
|
0.110 ug/L | 95% Rec (SL) | 7.20 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Benzo(a)pyrene(50-32-8)
|
0.080 ug/L | 65% Rec (SL) | 7.81 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Benzophenone (7CI,8CI)(119-61-9)
|
0.120 ug/L | 96% Rec (SL) | 7.99 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Bisphenol A(80-05-7)
|
0.380 ug/L | 28% Rec (SL) | 55.91 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Bromacil(314-40-9)
|
0.100 ug/L | 119% Rec (SL) | 5.39 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Bromoform(75-25-2)
|
0.180 ug/L | 43% Rec (SL) | 27.56 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Caffeine(58-08-2)
|
0.090 ug/L | 90% Rec (SL) | 6.72 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Camphor(76-22-2)
|
0.090 ug/L | 80% Rec (SL) | 6.95 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Carbamate pesticides(E-12895)
|
N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
Carbaryl(63-25-2)
|
0.440 ug/L | 161% Rec (SL) | 13.19 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Carbazole(86-74-8)
|
0.110 ug/L | 94% Rec (SL) | 7.86 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Chlorpyrifos(2921-88-2)
|
0.080 ug/L | 92% Rec (SL) | 5.13 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Cholesterol(57-88-5)
|
0.710 ug/L | 27% Rec (SL) | 13.27 % RSD (SL) | 2.00 ug/L | ||
Cotinine(486-56-6)
|
0.330 ug/L | 66% Rec (SL) | 8.44 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Cumene(98-82-8)
|
0.040 ug/L | 21% Rec (SL) | 12.42 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Diazinon(333-41-5)
|
0.070 ug/L | 93% Rec (SL) | 4.48 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Dichlorvos(62-73-7)
|
0.100 ug/L | 14% Rec (SL) | 44.38 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Equilenine(517-09-9)
|
1.800 ug/L | 58% Rec (SL) | 19.99 % RSD (SL) | 4.00 ug/L | ||
Estrone(53-16-7)
|
1.120 ug/L | 21% Rec (SL) | 46.82 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Ethynylestradiol(57-63-6)
|
2.080 ug/L | 67% Rec (SL) | 5.71 % RSD (SL) | 16.00 ug/L | ||
Fluoranthene(206-44-0)
|
0.080 ug/L | 82% Rec (SL) | 6.35 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
HHCB(1222-05-5)
|
0.120 ug/L | 76% Rec (SL) | 7.81 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Herbicides(E-12839)
|
N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
Indole(120-72-9)
|
0.140 ug/L | 74% Rec (SL) | 12.14 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Isoborneol(124-76-5)
|
0.110 ug/L | 88% Rec (SL) | 8.07 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Isophorone(78-59-1)
|
0.190 ug/L | 86% Rec (SL) | 11.64 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Isoquinoline(119-65-3)
|
0.110 ug/L | 84% Rec (SL) | 8.21 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Menthol(89-78-1)
|
0.080 ug/L | 87% Rec (SL) | 5.75 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Metalaxyl(57837-19-1)
|
0.080 ug/L | 48% Rec (SL) | 4.90 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Methyl salicylate(119-36-8)
|
0.080 ug/L | 88% Rec (SL) | 5.90 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Metolachlor(51218-45-2)
|
0.080 ug/L | 91% Rec (SL) | 5.53 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
N,N-Diethyl-m-toluamide(134-62-3)
|
0.140 ug/L | 100% Rec (SL) | 9.25 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Naphthalene(91-20-3)
|
0.150 ug/L | 56% Rec (SL) | 17.56 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Organics, semivolatile(E-12884)
|
N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
Organochlorine pesticides(E-12851)
|
N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
Organophosphate pesticides(E-12873)
|
N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
Pentachlorophenol(87-86-5)
|
0.390 ug/L | 80% Rec (SL) | 6.25 % RSD (SL) | 4.00 ug/L | ||
Phenanthrene(85-01-8)
|
0.080 ug/L | 80% Rec (SL) | 6.36 % RSD (SL) | 0.08 ug/L | ||
Phenol(108-95-2)
|
0.110 ug/L | 93% Rec (SL) | 7.80 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Prometon(1610-18-0)
|
0.120 ug/L | 100% Rec (SL) | 7.50 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Pyrene(129-00-0)
|
0.080 ug/L | 81% Rec (SL) | 5.80 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Tetrachloroethene(127-18-4)
|
0.030 ug/L | 18% Rec (SL) | 10.39 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Tri(2-butoxyethyl) phosphate(78-51-3)
|
0.200 ug/L | 103% Rec (SL) | 12.52 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Tri(2-chloroethyl) phosphate(115-96-8)
|
0.080 ug/L | 100% Rec (SL) | 5.04 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Tri(dichloroisopropyl) phosphate(13674-87-8)
|
0.080 ug/L | 96% Rec (SL) | 5.29 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Tributyl phosphate(126-73-8)
|
0.100 ug/L | 110% Rec (SL) | 5.97 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Triclosan(3380-34-5)
|
0.480 ug/L | 85% Rec (SL) | 5.00 % RSD (SL) | 4.00 ug/L | ||
Triethyl citrate(77-93-0)
|
0.090 ug/L | 98% Rec (SL) | 5.59 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Triphenyl phosphate(115-86-6)
|
0.060 ug/L | 90% Rec (SL) | 4.50 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
Volatile organic compounds(E-12419)
|
N/A | N/A | N/A | |||
beta-Sitosterol(83-46-5)
|
0.600 ug/L | 93% Rec (SL) | 11.10 % RSD (SL) | 2.00 ug/L | ||
beta-Stigmastanol(19466-47-8)
|
0.720 ug/L | 100% Rec (SL) | 11.71 % RSD (SL) | 2.00 ug/L | ||
d-Limonene(5989-27-5)
|
0.050 ug/L | 19% Rec (SL) | 19.06 % RSD (SL) | 0.05 ug/L | ||
p-Cresol(106-44-5)
|
0.270 ug/L | 36% Rec (SL) | 51.73 % RSD (SL) | 0.50 ug/L | ||
para-Nonylphenol(84852-15-3)
|
6.400 ug/L | 37% Rec (SL) | 53.73 % RSD (SL) | 10.00 ug/L |
Precision Descriptor Notes: | Matrices chosen to test method performance were: reagent-water, surface-water collected from the Platte River, Denver, Colorado; and ground-water samples collected in a domestic well near Evergreen, Colorado. The performance of this method for the extraction isolation and compound determination was evaluated by adding aliquots of standard solutions to eight subsamples of each matrix and processing the fortified samples through the entire method. The bias and precision data summarized in NEMI consists of the analysis results of reagent-water at the 0.5 ug/L spiking concentration. Method surrogates caffeine-13C3, fluoranthene-d10, bisphenol A-d3 and decafluorobiphenyl were included in the bias, accuracy, and MDL table; however, no MDL data was provided with these compounds. |
---|---|
Detection Level Note: | The National Water Quality Laboratory (NWQL) has addressed the limitations of the USEPA Method Detection Limit (MDL) procedure outlined in 40 CFR 136, App. B. The NWQL recommends an alternative for determining MDL's and reporting limits. It's called the Long-Term Method Detection Limit (LT-MDL). The LT-MDL is designed to catch greater method variability because it requires a larger number of replicate spike samples at least 24 per year, data be gathered over a longer period of time 6 to 12 months, and incorporates more measurement variability inherent in routine sample analysis such as multiple instruments, operators, calibrations, blank contributions and sample preparation events. The LT-MDL is based upon key assumptions underlying the USEPA procedure. These are a normal frequency distribution, constant standard deviation, and best-case detection. LT-MDL's like MDL's are determined using spikes in a clean matrix. See USGS Open File Report 99-193 regarding the LT-MDL. |
Revision | PDF/Link |
---|---|
2001 |
The Water Quality Portal contains
sample results from
sites that use this method.
Download WQP data
Select data:
File format:
Sites where this method was used
Loading Sites ...