| Fields
of Information for methods in the NEMI database
* = searchable field |
|
General
method information |
| Method
identifier |
The
identification number assigned by the method publisher (e.g., EPA Method
1631 is known as "1631" in the NEMI database; ASTM Method D2036-98 is known
as "D-2036-98", etc.). |
| Method
official name |
The
title of the method that appears on the method from the organization that
published it. |
| Method
descriptive name |
A
brief descriptive name - useful when a method's official name is long or
not very descriptive. Contains either the analyte name or a class of analytes,
and the instrument used for analysis. |
| Method
source* |
The
name, address, and Internet web site of the organization that published
the method. |
| Citation
|
The
published literature citation of the method, or volume from which the method
comes. Ordering information is also included (if available). |
| Subcategory* |
Subcategories
of analytes for which a method may be listed (e.g., "organics" is a subcategory
of the "chemical" category). |
| Media* |
The
four categories of media are Water, Air, Soil, and Other. The last catergory
(Other) includes methods that are applicable to a unique medium (e.g., Steam),
or to a variety of media (e.g., Water and Soil). Method summaries will specify
applicable media and matrices (if available). |
| Brief
Method Summary |
Method
summaries provide general information on methods. This includes: determinative
technique employed (e.g., colorimetry) and some summarized procedural information
(e.g., "sample is treated with barium chloride to precipitate out barium
sulfate, which is determined via colorimetry of turbimetry"). |
| Scope
and application |
Analyte
or analyte classes of interest (e.g., manganese, PAHs) and applicability
of methods to different matrices (e.g., water, ground water, TCLP sludges) |
| Instrumentation |
Key
or major instrumentation needed to perform an analysis with the specified
method. This is a reference to the determinative technique used by the method
(e.g., colorimetry, GC-MS). |
| Detection
level type |
The
DL can be the point where a substance will be detected, but not quantitated
(e.g., Method Detection Limit; MDL); the lowest concentration at which the
analyte can be accuractely quantitated (e.g., Minimum Level; ML); the lowest
level of an analyte that can be determined by an instrument ignoring the
possibility of analyte loss/contamination through sample pretreatment procedures
(e.g., Instrument Detection Limit; IDL), the lowest level in the calibration
range of the method, or the target regulatory level. Many organization will
have organization-specific variants on the general classes of DLs described
above. |
| Applicable
concentration range |
Range
of concentrations over which analytes can be measured with typical use of
the method. The range can be extended to higher or lower concentrations
by using appropriate sample preparative techniques, e.g., dilution, adjusting
sample size, concentration of extracts, etc. |
| Interferences |
Interferences
are any items which can lead to erroneously high or low results in the analysis
of a sample. |
| Precision
descriptor notes |
Description
of how precision and accuracy data were determined. |
| Quality
Control Requirements |
A
general description or listing of key quality control elements that are
in the method (e.g., matrix spikes, reagent blanks). |
| Sample
handling |
A
general description of sample handling requirements prior to instrumental
analysis (e.g., any preservation requirements, sample container requirements,
etc.). |
| Maximum
holding time |
The
maximum amount of time a sample may be held after it was collected and before
it is analyzed. |
| Sample
preparation methods |
The
methods or procedures necessary to prepare a sample for instrumental analysis
(e.g., extraction, digestion, filtration, concentration, etc.). |
| Relative
Cost |
Relative
cost per procedure of a typical analytical measurement using the specified
methods (i.e., the cost of analyzing a single sample). Additional considerations
affect total project costs (e.g., labor and equipment/supplies for a typical
sample preparation, QA/QC requirements to validate results reported, number
of samples being analyzed, etc.). |
| Link
to full method |
This
is a hyperlink to the home page of the organization where the full method
may be obtained. Methods that are public domain, such as those from EPA,
USGS, DOE, etc. may be downloaded directly from the NEMI web site. |
Analyte-specific information |
| Analyte* |
The
name assigned to a substance or feature that describes it in terms of its
molecular composition, taxonomic nomenclature or other characteristic. |
| Analyte
code |
A
unique tracking number for each analyte in the database. For organic chemicals,
the ID number is equivalent too to the CASRN. For anions, the ID number
is derived from the CASRN for common salts. For method-defined analytes
(analytes that are not chemically distinct, such as "oil and grease", and
"chemical oxygen demand") ID numbers are taken from EPA's Environmental
Monitoring Method Index codes. |
| Detection
level (DL)* |
The
lowest "measurable" concentration for an analyte by the specified method.
The DL for a specific analyte can be influenced by a number of factors,
such as the sample matrix used in a DL study or the laboratory's experience
with the method. Often a DL will be determined in reagent grade (very pure)
water to demonstrate the optimal DL. In many cases, the reported DL will
be generated by the method developer, which has considerable experience
with the method. Therefore the reported DL may be much lower than that achievable
by a laboratory using the method for the first time. Also, a reported DL
may reflect single laboratory performance or the pooled performance of multiple
laboratories (the latter providing a picture of overall method performance
across the laboratory community).
When comparing listed DLs it's important to take into consideration the
kind of DLs in questions, and the variables (e.g., matrix) that can effect
DLs. Available information on how DLs were determined for a particular method
is given in the DL Notes fields.
Reporting
units are the units of measurement in the particular method.
|
| Precision |
An
expression of the reproducibility of measurements. Analytical precision
is the measurement of the variability associated with two or more replicate
analyses. |
| Accuracy |
The
closeness to a "true" value. The true value is theoretical concentration
of an analyte added to the sample (e.g., spiking level). Often, accuracy
is expressed as percent recovery of a specified analyte in a specified matrix
(e.g., reagent grade water) is used to describe accuracy in published methods. |
| False
positive |
The
percent of samples analyzed that are reported to contain an analyte, when
none of the samples in the set actually contain the analyte. Often, the
percent of false positives is determined using blank samples, or samples
in which the analyte is below the lowest limit of quantitation, or below
the detection limit. |
| False
negative |
The
percent of samples analyzed that are reported not to contain an analyte,
when all of the samples in the set actually contain the analyte. Often,
the percent of false negatives is determined using samples in which the
analyte is above its specified regulatory contaminant level. |
| Spiking
level |
The
concentration of analytes in sample used to determine precision and accuracy. |
| Endpoint
|
The
conditions (physical, chemical or biological) which define when the analysis
is completed and the result is obtained. The endpoint can be simply a step
in sample preparation that puts the analyte in a state that can be easily
detected and enumerated (biological organisms) or quantified (chemicals).
In somewhat more complex cases, an endpoint may be the period of elapsed
time for a biological analyte to reach a specific developmental stage, or
for a chemical analyte to complete a reaction. |